Home / Opinion / Super caps: Keep calm and carry on (for now)

Super caps: Keep calm and carry on (for now)

The Treasurer's plan to limit concessional tax treatment within super at $3 million comes without a lot of the details required for effective retirement planning. Making bold changes now could be costly, says Wattle Partners principal Drew Meredith.
Opinion

Last week the Federal Government announced a major change to the taxation of superannuation assets. Importantly, this remains proposed and is unlikely to be legislated for at least 12 months.

Under the proposal, the balance of an individual’s member account within a superannuation fund, whether that is an SMSF, platform or industry super fund, will be subject to additional taxation.

Specifically, the earnings on the balance of an individual’s super account that exceeds $3 million will be taxed at an additional 15 per cent.

  • This will apply in addition to the current taxation rates that apply, being 15 per cent on those assets held in accumulation phase, and 0 per cent for those in pension phase.

    Importantly, this is calculated per member balance, or per person, rather than for an entire fund with the government suggesting less than 80,000 people will be impacted today.

    We have two key concerns with the proposal.

    The first is that the earnings that will be taxed at an additional 15 per cent will be calculated based on the notional or unrealised value of your member balance. That is, if the value of your super fund increases during a financial year, you will be taxed on the increase in the value, whether it is realised via the sale of assets or not.

    This sort of taxation does not apply in any other part of the taxation system, hence we do not believe it is likely to be passed in its current form on this basis.

    Similarly, the $3 million cap will not be indexed, hence a significantly higher number of people will likely be impacted by it in the future as balances continue to grow and inflation reduces the value of capital.

    As retirement and superannuation specialists, we are concerned about the constant tinkering with superannuation and taxation legislation. That said, despite the proposed changes superannuation will remain by far the most tax effective entity structure through which to hold your retirement assets.

    As the proposal works its way through the legislative process, however, and the picture becomes more certain, alternative options to maximise tax efficiency will become clearer. These may include family trusts, adding money to the superannuation balance of children, adding members to an SMSF or even setting up a corporate beneficiary.

    At this stage, and until the amendments are made clear in their ultimate form, the important thing for retirees who may be affected is to remain calm and refrain from making any drastic financial changes. As ever, with superannuation, the devil will be in the detail.




    Print Article

    Related
    The cost of aged care: Its bark is worse than its bite

    Australians can be confident that when the time comes to leave the family home and move into aged care, they will be given the appropriate support.

    Anthony Asher | 4th Dec 2024 | More
    Why baby boomers are opting to retire their industry fund

    APRA-regulated funds, especially profit-for-member funds, have had a good innings during the accumulation phase. It’s proving a different story in the decumulation phase with a growing number of members demanding a far more nuanced service.

    Drew Meredith | 27th Nov 2024 | More
    Gold might be any port in a storm in a Trump universe

    While a surging gold price is on hold as the world adjusts to a Trump presidency, all the factors that saw its price rise more than 50 per during his first term in office – trade disputes, fiscal deficits and geopolitical tensions – are almost certainly guaranteed the second time around.

    Nicholas Way | 20th Nov 2024 | More
    Popular